entries friends calendar user info Schlock Mercenary, the Online Comic Strip Previous Previous Next Next
profile
Howard Tayler
Name: Howard Tayler
calendar
Back May 2011
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031
links
page summary
tags
Howard Tayler - Movie Review: BloodRayne
Ramblings of a Happy Cartoonist
howardtayler
[info]howardtayler
Add to Memories
Share
Movie Review: BloodRayne
Okay, let's start with my instructions to you: no matter how enticing I may make this film sound, do NOT spend money on it. Don't see it in the theater, and don't rent it. Buying the DVD would be a crime against humanity. For that matter, don't bother seeing it for FREE, either. Spending your TIME on this film is a crime against your employer, your family, and the Baby New Year. You would be better off using an hour and thirty-four minutes eating junk food and watching Weather Channel repeats you've accidentally TIVO'd.

I'm serious. If I find out that you went and saw this film after I told you not to, I'll phone your friends up and tell them to go to your house and pour ants in your bed. And when you wake up screaming, covered in ants, you'll think "at least I'm not still watching BloodRayne."

Now, on to the review... we'll start with the music. There are three credited composers here, and I'm not sure which one I should be blaming for the horrible soundtrack. Maybe somebody in post-production tripped over the tape, and introduced all the wobbly, pitch-drifting bits. Or maybe the REAL soundtrack got destroyed in a fire, and they had to settle for the sound left on bits of tape on the cutting room floor. Seriously, it's that bad, and that's just the sound quality. The composition itself was criminal – the music swelled when nothing was happening, droned tediously during the action, and led me to wonder whether the composers actually bothered to watch the movie. (I hope they didn't. The fewer casualties this film has, the better.)

The cast was an amazing example of "gap" between the potential and the actual. Academy Award Winner Ben Kingsley, Michael Madsen, Billy Zane, Kristanna Loken, and Meat Loaf Aday are all capable actors. The potential for a GOOD film was there. Sadly, every last one of them phoned their parts in. Madsen in particular appears to have been brain damaged in the recent past – either that or he's trying out a new acting technique from the Bill Shatner School of Reading Fortune Cookies. I'd be inclined to blame it on the writing, or maybe on the directing, except that Madsen's a pro and should know better.

Poor Ben Kingsley. When his character finally dies, lying on the ground and shriveling as staked vampires are wont to do, I couldn't help but wonder if the scene wasn't meant as a metaphor for Ben's acting career. Maybe it's what's going to happen to Ben's agent for getting him into this stinker. For most of the film Ben was required to sit in a chair, deliver wooden lines, and brood stoicly. For his fight scene he looked like he was waiting tables.

The cinematography... Mathias and Michael Neumann (siblings, I assume) appear to have twigged to the "epileptic fit" setting on their steadi-cam. Calling them cinematographers does a disservice to everyone who ever submitted something to America's Funniest Home Videos and then lost. Matthias has worked with producer/director Uwe Boll on a number of other projects. I can't imagine that all of them are this bad. Perhaps bringing his brother in on this project was where he went wrong.

Allow me to pause here for a moment. Some folks flame people who criticize movies by saying "you couldn't do better." It's true. I probably couldn't do better. But I know the names of a dozen people who COULD have done better – better editing, better camera work, better scoring, better writing (okay, I could do that myself) and yes, better acting. This movie appears to have been made by a group of people who are individually among the worst their fields have to offer, and who went on to inspire each other to new lows.

With that out of the way...

Usually films like this have at least SOMETHING to offer in terms of special effects. BloodRayne the Video Game was hailed as the bloodiest game ever, and the film tries to pay homage to that. You know how after you've been playing a violent game for a while you can sometimes see the same pattern of blood-spatter each time you messily dispatch an enemy? Well, the film got THAT bit right. It would appear that they carefully rigged the same exact blood-spewing pump for each and every gore-shot, taking especial care to make sure that each splash looked just like the last one.

The writing... a good film has a certain flow to it. Some are burbling brooks, others mighty rivers. Some stagnate. BloodRayne was a dry riverbed, and the cast was required to “flow” a big rock down it. This involved repeatedly picking up said rock, moving it to the next spot, and then hurrying out of the picture. Poorly written video-games will flow better from one plot-point to another than this film did. Sure, the film is based on a video game, but it's supposed to be a MOVIE.

Regarding unnecessary nudity... frankly, if you're going to make a film this bad, you almost have to put lots of skin in it in order to get somebody to see it. It's not unnecessary if it's there to make money, right? Blech. With the right soundtrack, this film could have been cut to 15 minutes and turned into low-grade fetish porn.

I know how they got Meat Loaf Aday into the movie. They told him "don't bother reading the script... we're going to have you lie down on a bed with four Romanian prostitutes, and guess what! We'll use REAL prostitutes." What red-blooded, amoral, out-of-work actor could turn down an offer like that? (And yes, according to Uwe Boll, they hired prostitutes instead of actresses for Meat Loaf's scene. Apparently they're cheaper. I'm sure actresses worldwide are taking heart at THAT piece [ahem] of trivia.)

If I've inadvertently made the film sound enticing, I assure you it was an accident. If you find nudity enticing, please don't be tricked. This film doesn't do that. It takes whatever beauty there is to be found in the human form and, with the help of blood-splatter, bad dialog, and the Amazing Epilepsy-Cam, leaves you feeling empty. Oh, and dirty, and impoverished by far more than the time and money you spent on the film.

I'm not trying to tear this movie a new anal orifice. I assure you, the film already has SEVERAL, and it defecates simultaneously through all of them. You don't want to get any of this on you.

The best possible thing now would be for BloodRayne to fail so profoundly and so expensively that Uwe Boll (who, as executive producer, is the only person on the planet stupid enough to hire himself to direct) is forced out of the film business before he can contaminate anybody else's intellectual property, whether as producer, director, or the 3rd-unit gaffer's poo-flinging donut-monkey.

Tags: , ,

Comments
Page 1 of 2
[1] [2]
darthparadox From: [info]darthparadox Date: January 6th, 2006 04:58 pm (UTC) (Link)
Yeah, looking at the previews, I was guessing random nudity was going to be about all this movie had to offer. I guess they screwed that up too.

So. I'm hoping you haven't seen it, but if you by some sick twist of misfortune have, where would you rank this movie compared to Dungeons and Dragons? The acting, in particular, in the Bloodrayne trailer reminded me of it.
r_caton From: [info]r_caton Date: January 6th, 2006 05:03 pm (UTC) (Link)
There's a second Dungeons & Dragons movie coming out soon.....

I LIKED the first strangely enough. Anything with Richard O'Brien AND Tom Baker can't be all bad, even with Jeremy Irons...
lfinder From: [info]lfinder Date: January 6th, 2006 05:03 pm (UTC) (Link)
But, seriously. . .

How *did* you feel about the movie?

Naraht1 and I were wondering.

jmaynard From: [info]jmaynard Date: January 6th, 2006 05:07 pm (UTC) (Link)
Don't hold back, Howard. Let it out. Tell us what you really think about the movie.
kaolinfire From: [info]kaolinfire Date: January 6th, 2006 05:08 pm (UTC) (Link)
I think this review was the highlight of my day. :) And that's not saying that I didn't have at least several cups of very good coffee.
gurgi From: [info]gurgi Date: January 6th, 2006 05:10 pm (UTC) (Link)

Wow...

I can almost hear you attempting to sue to get that hour and 34 minutes of your life back...

Don't bother, it won't work... The judge just laughed at my "wrongful death" suit against Ben Stiller for his slaughter of the romantic comedy...

I've never played the game, and frankly, I think I'll boycot any game system that carries the title now...

Not that I don't like gore or nudity... I mean, hey, I'm only human...

But I won't put a DIME towards anyone who have HOPED to make money off of this apparent abortion of cinema...

Poor, poor Ben...
jmaynard From: [info]jmaynard Date: January 6th, 2006 05:23 pm (UTC) (Link)

Re: Wow...

Supposedly, every actor has one role he really, really regrets ever taking. I suspect this may be Kingsley's.
ronin_kakuhito From: [info]ronin_kakuhito Date: January 6th, 2006 05:26 pm (UTC) (Link)
I'd be inclined to blame it on the writing, or maybe on the directing, except that Madsen's a pro and should know better.
As I said above, in watching the director's commentary on the D&D movie, a decent actor's work can be made wooden and dull by an insistant director (not that I would suggest actually watching the movie and the deleted scenes.)
howardtayler From: [info]howardtayler Date: January 6th, 2006 05:29 pm (UTC) (Link)
Note: I'm not about to call for Madsen (or Kingsley, or even Lokken or Rodriquez) to retire. But Uwe Boll keeps taking lemons and making poop-soup. He appears to round up the worst performances from EVERYONE.

So yeah, maybe it's bad directing. I mean, there's definitely bad directing going on. Maybe you can blame the bad acting on it, too.
troutman From: [info]troutman Date: January 6th, 2006 06:11 pm (UTC) (Link)
You know, it was really your own fault for seeing an Uwe Boll movie in the first place.
howardtayler From: [info]howardtayler Date: January 6th, 2006 06:58 pm (UTC) (Link)
You do realize that I went into this hoping to be able to write a really scathing review, right?
jchaos From: [info]jchaos Date: January 6th, 2006 06:24 pm (UTC) (Link)
Howard, Howard, Howard... I hope I'm getting the stern "you should'a known better" tone conveyed properly in text.

It's Uwe Boll. What could have possessed you to see this movie in the first place?
howardtayler From: [info]howardtayler Date: January 6th, 2006 07:00 pm (UTC) (Link)
The desire to write a really scathing review. It was purgative.

I went with the owner of the local comic book store, and he and I had a great time cranking up the hyperbole generator.

cmzero From: [info]cmzero Date: January 6th, 2006 06:39 pm (UTC) (Link)
Consider yourself metaquoted. Again.
gurgi From: [info]gurgi Date: January 6th, 2006 08:31 pm (UTC) (Link)

I cut and pasted the whole darn thing...

But didn't link it, cause... Ummm...

Well, I'm pretty foul-mouthed (I try to hold it in around Howard and his Wife), and my friends ain't much better...

I just said "Someone else wrote this"... If someone asks, I'll tell them exactly who, but I think it stands just fine on it's own...
wulfbyu From: [info]wulfbyu Date: January 6th, 2006 06:41 pm (UTC) (Link)
I have to admit, at the beginning of this review I was almost slightly tempted to see this movie (though I had never previously had any remote inkling of a possibility of a desire to see it), if only due to the bizarre human psyche. Example: A person smells something absolutely terrible drifting out from around the corner, is disgusted for a moment, and then... breathes more deeply, if only for the purpose of determining whether something can actually smell that bad.

However, by the end of the review, even that inkling had been quashed.



After all, no one's gonna stick their head directly into a pile of elephant dung, no matter how curious they are.
mrfantasy From: [info]mrfantasy Date: January 6th, 2006 06:46 pm (UTC) (Link)

He did sum it up

"f I find out that you went and saw this film after I told you not to, I'll phone your friends up and tell them to go to your house and pour ants in your bed. And when you wake up screaming, covered in ants, you'll think 'at least I'm not still watching BloodRayne.'"
korgmeister From: [info]korgmeister Date: January 6th, 2006 06:47 pm (UTC) (Link)
Wow, you must have really hated this film. This is easily the crudest language I've ever seen you use.
(Not that I mind, it's just unusual coming from yourself.)
grrlgoddess From: [info]grrlgoddess Date: January 6th, 2006 06:53 pm (UTC) (Link)
So, do you know of a worse movie? :)
howardtayler From: [info]howardtayler Date: January 6th, 2006 07:05 pm (UTC) (Link)
I can think of films that are more damaging to watch (categorically, at any rate -- I'd put most pornography in that category for the way it encourages you to rewire your pleasure center), and I can think of films that I've enjoyed less (I don't like having my emotions tweaked in certain ways), but I cannot think of another PG/P13/R - rated general release which was so bad on so many counts.

There's just so much to hate about this film. I didn't even go into Rodriguez or Loken's acting. Or the horse-back scenes. Or the sword-play. Or the costuming. The list goes on and on and on. The only thing that didn't suck was the fact that Billy Zane looked like he was having a good time.
ceejayoz From: [info]ceejayoz Date: January 6th, 2006 06:54 pm (UTC) (Link)
I'm not trying to tear this movie a new anal orifice. I assure you, the film already has SEVERAL, and it defecates simultaneously through all of them. You don't want to get any of this on you.

That made me laugh out loud. Heeheehee.
blackorchid1 From: [info]blackorchid1 Date: January 9th, 2006 07:56 am (UTC) (Link)
Me too! So hard not to laugh louder when you're at work.
haesslich From: [info]haesslich Date: January 6th, 2006 07:36 pm (UTC) (Link)
Sounds like a movie that, if MST3K were still around, which would dethrone the uncut version of 'Manos: The Hands of Fate' as the film to MST - I mean, every video game movie's bad... but it appears Uwe Boll's hitting two for two now, in terms of bad cinema.

I'm kinda hoping that the BloodRayne game franchise dies now, myself. That'd teach them. :D
jordanis From: [info]jordanis Date: January 6th, 2006 07:49 pm (UTC) (Link)
Having seen the Manos MST, I'm not sure that's possible.
patch_bunny From: [info]patch_bunny Date: January 6th, 2006 08:45 pm (UTC) (Link)
Forgive me for popping in unannounced, but a friend told me that someone had foolishly gone to see a Uwe Boll film, and I had to peek at your review.

When I questioned why Uwe Boll keeps getting financing, I was referred to this article. Uwe does appear to be using the tax angle. It's like watching The Producers unfold in real life. Can Uwe Boll's production of Springtime for Hitler be far behind?

What's frightening is not that he's made House of the Dead, is not that he's made Alone in the Dark, is not even that he's made Bloodrayne. What's frightening is that he's got five more movies in the pipeline.
falar From: [info]falar Date: January 6th, 2006 09:19 pm (UTC) (Link)
... Are all those video game movies that will likely suck no matter who did them or is that just me? I mean ... a Dungeon Seige movie.
driftpeasant From: [info]driftpeasant Date: January 6th, 2006 10:40 pm (UTC) (Link)
So I saw that Mr. Tayler was going to see this movie.

And, when I was kicked out of my office by a roving band of roofing sealers who were going to need the entire parking lot, I drove over to my local theater and laid out 6.25 of my hard earned dollars for this movie. I figured, if it's good enough for Howard, it's good enough for me. After all, he endured Linucon 2, and that counts for something.

...

Words cannot describe how BAD this movie is...

Really. The fight scenes are utterly horrific. The shaky cam tries to mask how bad the coreography is, but it still can't overcome the fundamental woodenness. Further, there is little difference made between the human thralls and the vampires - both apparently die equally well to slashing sword blows to the chest.

The WORST part about this whole thing though, was the UTTER disregard for continuity. Vampires in obvious sunlight, riding to a shelter to "get in before dawn." The most glaring example has to be the water scene. The heroine is transported in a boat across a big lake to the Super Secret Vampire Hunter Castle (always shrouded in darkness, and conveniently in the center of a large lake where, you know, it's TOTALLY VISIBLE yet apparently a Big Secret). On the way across, the three vampire hunters in the movie debate whether to kill the heroine. The most compelling argument for her life is that "this boat ride would kill a normal vampire - she must be special - this could turn the tide for us." I'm not sure how having ONE vampire who can cross large bodies of water really helps since, you know, if the rest can't, they're all concentrated in one continent, and therefore more likely to be in easy travelling distance to back each other up, but whatever. So about 20 minutes later, when the vampires send the human thralls across the lake to attack the Super Secret Vampire Hunter Castle, who is in the lead boat? Yes, that's right, the Number One Vampire Minion. Who, despite lacking the ONE MAGICAL ITEM IN THE WORLD THAT ALLOWS VAMPIRES TO CROSS WATER is still fine. Osmosis, maybe?

The best quote I can think of though, came from the theater clean up crew. They came in about 5 minutes before the end of the movie and sat down to watch the climax. As I walked by them on the way out of the theater, one looked at me and said "if it were up to me, I'd totally refund your money right now." "Oh, did you see the whole thing?" "No, just those last 5 minutes."

If you'll all excuse me now, I'm going to go watch some QUALITY filmmaking - like Gigli or Ishtar. I'm afraid the taint won't scrub from my mind without something that caustic...
larksilver From: [info]larksilver Date: January 6th, 2006 11:18 pm (UTC) (Link)
Or Xanadu!
larksilver From: [info]larksilver Date: January 6th, 2006 11:26 pm (UTC) (Link)
There's something so completely satisfying to go to a film you know is going to stink, fully intending to chop it to itty bits. It's almost visceral, isn't it?

For me, it was Catwoman. I did not see this film until it had been on video for a year or more, and so I knew it was going to stink before I watched it (my mate, bless him, will watch paint dry, and since he hadn't seen this particular bit of film horror history, insisted). It was every bit as bad as I thought it would be, and I had such fun stomping all over it.

I am not a movie critic. There are a number of terrible films out there that I enjoy, sometimes to my own embarrassment, even. That said..Once upon a time, I used to say "hey, that movie was pretty good, for a comic book movie." Or, for a normal film, I would say "at least it wasn't (insert name of most recent comic book film)."

Now, though, that's all topsy-turvy. Thanks to the disaster that was Catwoman, and some pretty darn good comic book renditions on the Big Screen in recent years, my medicine for any bad film has become "Hey, at least it wasn't as bad as Catwoman."

From your description, however, I think I'll avoid Bloodrayne altogether, even for free. It sounds like my brain would implode from the pain of it. heheh
howardtayler From: [info]howardtayler Date: January 7th, 2006 12:03 am (UTC) (Link)
Catwoman had problems, but I enjoyed it. I regretted seeing it on a weekend when I could have seen something else, but I still enjoyed it.

BloodRayne deserves a "bad movie" category of its own. Maybe the "they DELIBERATELY made a horrible movie in order to get a tax write-off" category. Seriously... it's the worst film I've seen.

--Howard
spritelord From: [info]spritelord Date: January 7th, 2006 12:30 am (UTC) (Link)
I'm pretty sure that it's been long established that Uwe Boll not only hates video games and movies, but also hates, specifically and individually, everyone who goes to see movies.
conflicted_hero From: [info]conflicted_hero Date: January 7th, 2006 01:28 am (UTC) (Link)

I'm gonna go see it.

I've decided now, I'm going to go and see it. I'll try out being a masochist, see if I can't innure myself to it further. And bring on the ants. We've got those pesky little red ones out here, we'll try those for a start.
I'm lying for fun.

Or am I?
cheops From: [info]cheops Date: January 7th, 2006 03:24 am (UTC) (Link)
Drive a stake through Uwe Boll and he does not die; he pops, spewing pus and bad scripts all over the countryside. I am convinced he has blackmail-worthy dirt on most of Hollywood's dealmakers to be continually employed as he is, and not chained to giant crucifix, stuffed in a rocket, and fired into the sun.
zodarzone From: [info]zodarzone Date: January 9th, 2006 02:18 pm (UTC) (Link)
Have you seen the petition to have him stop? It's here.
demonicgerbil From: [info]demonicgerbil Date: January 7th, 2006 04:38 am (UTC) (Link)
So, when's that Schlock Mercenary movie coming out, Howard? :p
wulfbyu From: [info]wulfbyu Date: January 7th, 2006 05:46 am (UTC) (Link)
Ooh, just had an idea! Howard Tayler teams up with the Brothers Chaps to create *drumrolldrumrolldrumroll* Schlockstar Runnercenary!: The Online Operatic Space Comedy!!!!




I want 15% for the idea, Howard. ;-)
leslie_r From: [info]leslie_r Date: January 7th, 2006 06:02 am (UTC) (Link)
Some others have some rather bad views on this Uwe Boll person as well...

http://forum.spacebattles.com/showthread.php?t=94527
maxdwolf From: [info]maxdwolf Date: January 9th, 2006 01:03 pm (UTC) (Link)

My favorite quote from there...


"Uwe Boll is the only movie that can fuck up a story involving a sexy ninja vampire who kills Nazis..."

Out of the mouths of fanboys...
nnymoose777 From: [info]nnymoose777 Date: January 7th, 2006 06:26 am (UTC) (Link)
Okay, let's start with my instructions to you: no matter how enticing I may make this film sound, do NOT spend money on it. Don't see it in the theater, and don't rent it. Buying the DVD would be a crime against humanity. For that matter, don't bother seeing it for FREE, either. Spending your TIME on this film is a crime against your employer, your family, and the Baby New Year.

That's how I felt about watching Napoleon Dynamite. And seeing The Mars Volta in concert. That's collectively four hours of my life that wasted ten years. Like the torture device in The Princess Bride.
randytayler From: [info]randytayler Date: January 7th, 2006 08:54 am (UTC) (Link)
Wow. Napoleon Dynamite? Really? Everyone I know likes that movie -- though some didn't like it at first. It was one of those retrospectively humorous films for some folks. As in, they laughed when they heard it quoted, or thought about scenes they'd seen, but didn't really laugh when they saw it.
zoyx From: [info]zoyx Date: January 7th, 2006 08:23 am (UTC) (Link)
For a second there, I thought I was reading a somethingawful.com column.
From: [info]bbullock Date: January 7th, 2006 08:34 am (UTC) (Link)
Right about this time, Jesus Christ: Vampire Hunter is lookin' pretty good, hey?
179 comments or Leave a comment
Page 1 of 2
[1] [2]