 |
|
 |

 |
howardtayler | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Back in 2003 I hired a colorist, Jean Fioca (used to be Elmore). Having someone else handle the coloring was wonderful, and Jean was great at it. A lot of the coloring tricks I use now I learned looking at her work on my characters. I'm considering hiring a colorist again. I'm busy enough to justify it, and would love to see somebody willing and able to express themselves through the colors, rather than just going through the motions the way I do. But don't send in your resumés just yet... the colorist I want to hire is already getting on the job training. She did the flood filling and shading on the last two rows of today's strip, and almost all the floods for next week. She's still learning the swatches, and doesn't know which backgrounds to drop in without coaching from me, but I can tell already that she'll work out fine if I can keep her interested. I am going to have to raise her allowance. My 12-year-old daughter, whom you may know from sandratayler's Live Journal as "Kiki," is my apprentice colorist. She has had some classical art training using pastels and watercolors, but has next to no Photoshop experience. That didn't stop her from pencilling, scanning, coloring, and shading a picture of Link last week, using Adobe Photoshop Elements. She was coloring using a technique she copied from me -- lassoing areas to be shaded and darkening them with the flood tool and swatches that looked right. And the shading DID look right. The girl has a good eye. Sandra was concerned. "She's been working on that piece for DAYS now, Howard." I checked to see what she was actually working on. "It's not a problem. She's trying to darken her pencil lines, and they're in the same layer as the colors. She's going pixel by pixel." I told Kiki what she was doing wrong, and suggested that since correcting line art in this way was no fun at all, maybe she'd have more fun coloring some clean line art for me. For pay. She was sitting next to me at my computer within 15 minutes. Naturally, I have some concerns: 1) I don't want her art style to be mere mimicry of my own. I have to encourage her to experiment -- at least once she has the basics down. 2) We are going to have to strike a balance between "Kiki's Style" and "Staying On Model." 3) Criticism of Schlock Mercenary may extend to the work she does, and she is not nearly thick-skinned enough to be reading some anonymity-emboldened, blogtarded wannabe tear her work apart. 4) Saddling a 12-year-old with this level of responsibility is a life-changing thing. She may end up with a job skill, or even a full-blown career. Then again, digital art may end up forever poisoned for her. 5) She is not old enough to be famous. Or so says me, anyway. I don't mind fanboys stalking me down at the comics shop, but the first fanboy who stalks my baby girl is going to to discover that he can breathe through the gurgling hole where his nipple-piercing used to be. I'm not asking for advice. I already have approaches for numbers 1-3 above, and Kiki and I will be talking about #4. Number five... well, let's just say that if I have to go to jail because I killed my colorist's stalker, the comic strip will end. No stalking, okay?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: gurgi |
Date:
July 1st, 2007 06:18 pm (UTC)
|
| (Link) |
|
|
Now, when you say she did the last two rows, are you saying she did the glow around Tagon?
Honestly, her work on today's strip looks fantastic. I'm looking at it, and seriously, it's impossible for me to tell you didn't do it, and if you'd not said anything, I would never had known.
As for possible stalkers, I think it's safe to say that there are plenty of people who would be more than happy to look the police in the eye and say "He was here all night officer".
Tell her good luck from the lot of us, and congrats.
Soon we will have an heiress to the Schlock dynasty.
Soon she'll even be able to claim a book to her credit, since it won't be too long for her work to make it into a dead-tree edition.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: 0702034 |
Date:
July 14th, 2007 05:19 am (UTC)
|
| (Link) |
|
OT: Arithmetic error in your latest post?
|
I'll start off by apologizing for this off-topic comment. Your ``EMAIL HOWARD'' link leads to a blank page, and I didn't want to be scooped on my very first nitpick after two years of error-free Schlock.
The latest strip (Saturday 14 July 2007) includes the line, ``The margin of error in your guess at your own age is bigger than the age of my whole species.'' The guess in question is 12 million years, and the margin of error 1% (in either direction, I assume), or 240 000 years.
Wikipedia on ``Human Evolution'' claims that anatomically modern humans probably began 400 000 to 250 000 years prior to our present, already outside the 240 000 year range. Dating things with respect to Schlock's present, which I assume to be quite a bit into our future, should widen the gap further. (If you would cue the triumphant drums of successful nitpickery, yes, just like that, excellent)
Otherwise, thanks for a really awesome webcomic, and thanks for getting me into webcomics.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
 |
 |


|
 |